|

From
Our President, JOHN FLORANCE
Ruddigore. . . A Personal View
IN
the popularity league table, Ruddigore has never been up there with
such winners as The Mikado, The Pirates of Penzance and The Gondoliers.
On the other hand, it has never languished in the relegation zone
like Princess Ida and The Grand Duke.
There
are historical reasons for its middling position. Because it followed
the record breaking Mikado it suffered from the great expectations
of press and public alike.
What
could surpass the Savoy's Japanese opera? Not Ruddigore apparently!
For the first time boos were heard from the gallery at a Savoy premiere.
These were mainly directed at the staging of the supernatural scenes
but cries of "Give us back The Mikado!" were also heard.
Perhaps
those first critics of the piece noticed that Gilbert was rehashing
old ideas. For instance, the gallery of ancestral portraits derives
from a non Savoy piece he'd written years before called Ages Ago
and the Sir Roderic and Dame Hannah relationship brings to mind
a similar couple in The Sorcerer. The plot was largely derived from
Rookwood by W. Harrison Ainsworth and the parody of naval behaviour
and language reminds one of HMS Pinafore.
In
addition, the blood and thunder melodrama of which Ruddigore is
a parody was virtually extinct as a theatrical fashion. If all that
wasn't enough, even the sanguinary of the title drew comment from
some quarters, causing the irascible Gilbert to suggest it should
be changed to Kensington Gore or Not Half so Good as The Mikado.
In the end he simply changed the spelling from Ruddygore to Ruddigore.
Given
all this it is hardly surprising that Ruddigore was one of the few
operas not revived during the lifetime of its creators. The initial
run of The Mikado was 672 performances; Ruddigore ran for 288. "It
was", writes Hesketh Pearson, "what the Savoy partners called a
failure". But his next sentence makes clear that "failure" was a
relative concept. "That is to say, Gilbert made seven thousand pounds
out of the original run, Sullivan made more because of the sale
of his music and Carte made most of all because having only financed
it instead of creating it, he naturally made the most".
None
of this, however, really accounts for the relative neglect of Ruddigore
today for I am convinced that it is one of Gilbert & Sullivan's
finest creations. In part, the reservations Gilbert himself had
about the piece are the very reasons why we today can arrive at
a more just estimate of its qualities.
The
playwright had an admirable sense of his own competence and very
rarely expressed an opinion on the art which was Sullivan's sphere,
but on this occasion he blamed the composer's music for the opera's
poor reception. "I fancy he thought his position demanded something
grander and more impressive than the words suggested" he wrote to
a friend, adding that the ghost music was like introducing fifty
lines of Paradise Lost into a farcical comedy. He was, of course,
thinking of Sir Roderic's superb song "When the night wind howls"
with its colourful orchestration, unusual harmonies and unexpected
rhythms. These days we can appreciate stylistic contrast with rather
more pleasure than Gilbert. Indeed the stylistic breadth, abundant
subtleties and sly felicities of Sullivan's score are what make
Ruddigore the gem it is.
Of
course, the team's old trademarks are there, such as the patter
trio "My eyes are fully open" (which delightfully makes mock of
the convention) and the parodies of grand opera. But the score also
abounds in numbers that either represent something new or a real
development of tried and tested techniques. For example, it seems
to me that the Act One finale is an advance on the much-lauded equivalent
in The Mikado. It contains one of the composer's sweetest inventions
(the madrigal) and the interrupted gavotte is marvellously done.
Mention
of that reminds one how cleverly Sullivan uses dance in the score.
The hornpipe, gavotte and others pave the way for even more subtle
integration of dance into the fabric of The Gondoliers and Utopia.
The finale of the opera ("Oh happy the lily") in 9/8 time is delightfully
unexpected and the aforementioned song of Sir Roderic represents
daring and inspiration of a kind not heard elsewhere in the canon.
Whilst
Gilbert the playwright often marks time (though the picture gallery
scene was effective enough for it to be virtually lifted by the
creators of Me and My Girl fifty years later) Gilbert the lyricist
shows no sign of diminished power. For example, Mad Margaret's Act
One scena and ballad are splendid examples of his art, as is the
madrigal, which moves even without Sullivan's music.
One
could go on but the risk of boredom looms! For those unconvinced
that Ruddigore should be up there with the league champions, well
all I can say is that I hope our production will persuade you otherwise!
|